Friday, 18 May 2012

Caroline Lucas Interview: New Statesman

What made you go into politics?
I come from a very conventional and non-political background. The only newspaper in our house when I was growing up was the Daily Mail, and we would never have dreamt of discussing politics around the dinner table. So my involvement in politics came about through activism. I joined the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament in the 1980s and protested at Greenham Common. I supported other causes too – fighting discrimination and environmental degradation – but it was only on reading Seeing Green by Jonathan Porritt in 1986 that I realised all these issues were underpinned by the political process. The Green Party offered a political solution which recognises the connections: how our economy is built on the use of finite resources in other countries; how this leads to the exploitation of the people of those countries, interference in their political freedom, even military commitments and involvement in wars; and how those who make their money and gain their power through such economic relationships are all too well-placed to influence decision-making behind the scenes.

What job did you do before you became an MP?
I worked for Oxfam for 10 years, most recently as head of their Trade policy team, and also had a year's secondment to help set up a new international trade department in Dfid. I also held various positions in the Green Party, including national press officer, Principal Speaker, and now Leader, and won our second council seat in the UK on Oxford County Council. In 1999 I was elected to the European Parliament as the Green member for the South East and served until 2010, when I became the UK’s first Green MP, representing my constituency of Brighton Pavilion.

Which law would you scrap?
I’d like to be even more ambitious and change the central policy of this government – that of budget cuts and austerity.   A government can’t cut its way out of a recession any more than you can dig yourself out of a hole. It’s not just a question of "too far too fast", as Labour claims, but the fact that it's precisely in a recession that the government needs to invest in jobs – and particularly green jobs, since a green economy is far more labour intensive than the fossil fuel economy it replaces.  In terms of where to find the money, the government could start by scrapping Trident, cracking down on tax evasion and avoidance, and introducing significant green quantitative easing directly into the economy.

And if you could pass one law, what would it be?
I’d bring proportional representation – nothing would do more to open up British politics and give a greater voice to people up and down the country who have become completely disillusioned with the three main Westminster parties.

Do politics and religion mix?
No

Who is your favourite prime minister from history, and why?
Can I cheat and choose someone from the present day? The Prime Minister of Iceland, Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir – the country’s longest-serving member of Parliament, first female Prime Minister, and the world's first openly lesbian head of government, she has also blazed a trail on women’s equality.

Name three dream dinner-party guests.
Mary Wollstonecraft, Gandhi and Jeanette Winterson.

Which politician from a different party do you most admire?
Salma Yaqoob, for being so honest, principled, compassionate and articulate.

What's your karaoke song of choice?
Bit predictable really, but it would have to be "Sweet Caroline" by Neil Diamond.

What's the last film you saw?
Marley – a really excellent biopic, which makes you appreciate just what a huge impact one individual can have on the world.

What’s the last work of fiction you read?
The secret intensity of everyday life, by William Nicholson – it’s an incredibly compassionate novel, as well as being very witty and intelligent.

Newsnight or Question Time?
I like both, but probably Question Time – it reaches a wider audience and you get far more input from real people, as opposed to just politicians and media commentators.

Humphrys or Paxman?
I really like Carolyn Quinn – can I choose her instead?

Who is your favourite blogger?
Too many to choose from, but I particularly follow the blogs on False Economy.

Who is your favourite newspaper columnist?
Laurie Penny at the Independent.

If you could change one thing about your job, what would it be?
The hours. I’d love to spend a bit more time with my family and dog.

What's the funniest or saddest thing you've ever heard at a surgery?
Unfortunately, I hear far more sad stories than funny ones. Many of the constituents who come to see me are struggling against Kafka-esque levels of bureaucracy, whether it’s claiming the welfare payments they are entitled to or battling with the byzantine and seemingly inhuman procedures of the Border Agency.

What was your worst doorstep campaigning moment?
No one moment springs to mind, but I’ve had a few slammed doors.

Who is the most important person in your life, and why?
That’s easy  - my husband Richard and our two sons, for their love, support and – fortunately - superhuman patience.

Do you think you will ever be prime minister - and if not, why not?
No. Until we have proportional representation, no-one from the smaller parties stands a chance. On the positive side, I don’t think I’d like to live in Downing Street – I’d miss Brighton too much

Read it here:
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/politics/2012/05/mp-interview-caroline-lucas

Friday, 20 January 2012

Meeting NEXT WEEK: Nuclear-Powered Submarine Dismantling Project

The consultation every person living in Plymouth
needs to know about

Meeting to discuss the Nuclear-Powered Submarine Dismantling Project and to share advice on
how to fill in and submit the consultation form.


Ian Avent, Campaign Against Nuclear Storage And Radiation (CANSAR )
“If Plymouth is to effectively become a nuclear scrapyard, what impact will this
have on a city with aspirations as a World Centre of Tourism and University
Centre of Excellence?”
Di Mcdonald , Nuclear Submarine Forum (NSubF)
“Any community that accepts a new risk...should be entitled to see the reduction of an equivalent risk from existing practices”
The speakers will give a brief overview of How We Got Here
And The Least Bad Option in the consultation. We will provide consultation forms for you to complete and submit should you wish still to participate in the most important decision affecting the people of Plymouth for five generations.

Where: 171 Armada Way
When: Wednesday 25th January, 7.00 pm
                                                                                                    
This is the key opportunity to respond to MOD plans which could if unopposed lead to Plymouth unnecessarily becoming the only site in the UK for dismantling these submarines and storing the intermediate radioactive waste from them. Why cannot the companies that built them, dismantle them?  We need the ability to defuel nuclear-powered submarines to be dispersed around several sites in the UK including Scotland. Lets not have all our ’eggs’ in one ‘basket’ (or in the centre of a city of 250,000 people)


The Nuclear-Powered Submarine Dismantling Project – possibly coming soon to a dockyard near to your house.



Please pass this on to others who might be interested.
Supported by NSubF, Transition Plymouth, Plymouth Green Party and CANSAR

Friday, 13 January 2012

Letter: In Support of Occupy Plymouth

I recently had a letter printed in the Plymouth Herald (about two weeks ago) in support of the Occupy Plymouth movement; however, due to a problem with the website, there are no letters displayed as a weblink from 30th December to 4th January! So, here is the letter:

'I write in protest to the recent article ‘Rest of us are free’ (published Friday, 23 December 2011). This short, misguided opinion piece appears to have ridiculed the great efforts of the people of Occupy Plymouth.

Rather than dismiss this grouping of dedicated people, Plymothians should be supporting them in attempting to promote debate about the inequalities in our society.  And rest assured, in this financial crisis where people are losing their livelihoods, inequalities surround us. Such debates are in danger of being ignored by trivialised by weak reporting and a childish grasp of today’s political climate.

The writer comments on those at Occupy Plymouth failing ‘to see the human, the humanity of life.’ I’m of the firm opinion Occupy Plymouth sees humanity for all its beauty and worth; this is the reason they are so dedicated and continue fighting. The right to political self-expression has been eroded and needs to be re-asserted. Occupy Plymouth are doing a fine job of doing this.'


Here is the text of the article: 'Rest of Us are Free':

'KARL ENGELS sits at the bar sipping his pint of French revolutionary lager.
His mobile phone is in the hands of the bar girl. Apparently he can't use the phone to send text messages, and needs her to do it for him. On the other hand he could be just using this as an excuse to come on to her.
Karl is well known around the pubs on the Barbican and he's what you might call an old fashioned Marxist. One of those people on the Left who have never accepted the fact that the Berlin wall fell over 20 years ago.
As the bar girl fiddles with his phone. trying to send this text message, he points at an RNLI charity box on the bar. Now we all know that the RNLI is a voluntary organisation, whose volunteers risk life and limb to save others in distress at sea.
Only Karl does not see it this way. Instead he says to the bar girl that the RNLI is an organisation which rips money off poor people sat at bars to rescue rich people who can afford to buy the kind of yachts and motor boats tied up in Sutton Harbour.
The girl behind the bar gives Karl a whatever kind of look and hands him back the phone, telling him that his text message has been sent. She then walks up the bar and begins to sort out the glasses. Then I just had to lean across from where I was standing and drop some change in to the RNLI box. Karl remained silent.
Thinking this event over in my mind, I can only think that Karl is the type of person who supports the Occupy Plymouth movement, who have been squatting in the old Buckwell Street Job Centre in the City Centre. These are people who believe that the so-called rich are the bedevilment of our society, and that they should pay for the rest of us to live our lives. They also see themselves as being in a constant class struggle with all who disagree with them. They talk of bringing down the rich and the bankers. Of destroying the capitalist system without having any clear ideas about what they are going to replace it with.
Occupy Plymouth also has the habit of habit of hiding their faces behind balaclavas and Guido Fawkes masks.
But the problem which underlies this whole movement can be summed up in Karl's response to the RNLI charity tin, and that is the fact that they always see the rich as the problem and therefore must be brought down. No matter what argument is brought together in opposition to the occupy movement, they will always answer that it is the rich that is the problem. Rich is the only answer they will ever have.
They may well want to bring down the rich, but they never seem to want to raise anyone else up – which has always been the fundamental issue underlying conservative far left ideology. This movement will only ever be able to analyse life in the terms given to them by old debunked Marxist theory.
From a certain point of view the Occupy Movement is a naive leftover of the Sixties. They contain that old trace of paranoia about the 'man' being out to get them – whether that is the government or some other large democratic institution. They cannot live and only see other humans as ciphers represented by their wealth and position in society, regardless of where that position may well be. It is through this that they fail to see the human, the humanity of life. Like Karl they can only see a singular axiom which ends in the word 'rich'. There is nothing else here other then this word. And because of this they still have not moved on to a point of maturity where they can see the full picture of life. Instead for Occupy Plymouth it will always be an us verses them scenario and nothing much else.
In the end it does not really matter if we are rich or poor, but it is in the way we live that counts. Ideology and Occupy Plymouth are nothing more then blinkers that stop the individual from seeing what life has to offer.
Of course, this argument, will never really convince Occupy Plymouth or the likes of Karl Engels. He will be more then happy with another pint and trying to get the bar girl to send text messages and complaining about the RNLI. The rest of us though will be living and not opposing our own humanity. In this sense we are the ones who are truly free.'

Saturday, 24 September 2011

Caroline Lucas at Autumn Conference, 2011




Click on the link and watch Green leader Caroline Lucas' autumn conference 2011 speech: highlighting Green policy successes in Brighton (the first Green led council), as well as attacking the hypocrisy of Labour, and the lies of the Con-Dems.

Read more here:
http://www.greenparty.org.uk/mediacentre/releases/caroline-lucas-autumn-conference-speech-2011-sheffield.html

Tuesday, 21 June 2011

Planning Objection to the St Budeaux Incinerator

App. No: 11/00750/FUL Site Address: LAND AT NORTH YARD, DEVONPORT DOCKYARD ST BUDEAUX PLYMOUTH PL2 2DQ

We, members of Plymouth Green Party, are writing to object to the application to build an incinerator in the North Yard at St Budeaux, Plymouth .

In relation to the building application itself, Plymouth Green Party believe the incinerator would be a large detriment to the area. Practical considerations include the rise in noise disturbance and the escape of foul smells.

This area of Plymouth will be forced to accommodate a dominating and ugly structure, bringing pressure upon local space (such as car-parking for employees) in what is already a congested area with traffic from the A38 by-pass. We are further concerned about the impact upon trees and the local wildlife; as well as the erosion of yet more open space.

We are further concerned about the impact to the health of local residents, with many studies citing the risks brought about by long term exposure to air-born particles from the chimneys of incinerators; including links to lung cancer and respiratory problems. A 95 metre high chimney – 10 metres higher than originally proposed – would become a foul and ugly landmark of Plymouth . Incinerators encourage the indiscriminate junking of resources. The city would be turning away from becoming greener, with the message sent out that there is no need to reuse or recycle, as we can simply now throw away and incinerate.

Plymothians have been vocal and they are adamant they do not want this. Along with the above considerations, the incinerator will bring about a reduction in property and land value in the area, condemning this large part of Plymouth as a no-go and no-buy area.

We believe the above objections rule out any logic in permitting the building of an incinerator at the North Yard site in St Budeaux. It would make a mockery of our city’s vision for a brighter and better future, with the council turning their back on Plymouth ’s hailed “spirit of discovery” by refusing to seek out the viable alternatives.

Plymouth Green Party


Find out more about the fantastic and industrious group Incineration Is Wrong:

Saturday, 7 May 2011

2011 Election Round-Up

Another election, another year. Labour revival, Lib Dem collapse. In the words of Thom Yorke of Radiohead: ‘I go forward – you go backwards – and somewhere we will meet.’

Across the country the picture for the Green Party is a positive one: gains in Norwich and Bristol, including becoming the largest party on Brighton council – a first for the party. But there are the frustrations as well, to the unfortunate Jake Griffiths who failed to take a predicated Welsh assembly seat and to the smaller number of anticipated MSPs north of the border.

Closer to home, Greens won three district council seats in the South Hams; and although in Exeter the party fielded a full slate – with an impressive campaign video to match – they failed to cause a stir.

And what of Plymouth?

Here, the party fielded seven candidates, a number lower than recent years. The vote percentage was much the same as other elections, with the number of votes just under the 200 mark (exceptions being Matt Ray in St Peter & the Waterfront, Colin Trier in Compton and Tean Mitchell in Sutton & Mount Gould). In the tightly contested ward of Drake, Wendy Miller beat off UKIP and independents, whilst remaining only a few votes away from the Lib Dem candidate.

Labour made gains of five seats, taking Tory scalps with them on the road to victory. And they were thoroughly deserved victories, with Chris Penberthy in St Peter & the Waterfront and Chaz Singh in Drake taking their place on the council. ‘We’re coming to get you,’ stated Plymouth Labour’s leader, Tudor Evans. Another round of defeats like this would see Labour take control come 2012.

Meanwhile, UKIP continued to improve on their recent election results in the city; they fielded seventeen candidates and in effect have become Plymouth’s third party. The former holders of this position, the Lib Dems, continued to perform badly, in tandem with their national performance. The prospects look bleak for the Lib Dems, as they await developments in Westminster – one expects they’d prefer Nick Clegg to do a run-over and for a revival to take place.

Plymouth Green Party will continue to contest these elections. Next year we hope to return to double figures for our candidates, to increase our vote and spread the message in this city: there is an alternative.

Plymouth City Council results:
Compton - turnout 42.84 per cent
Candidates  Party  Votes  Elected
Michael Robert Cooke  UK Independence Party  364   
Paul Huntley  The Liberal Democrats  359   
Stephen Paul Randall  The Labour Party  1,086   
David John Stark  The Conservative Party  1,938  Yes
Colin James Trier  The Green Party  268
  
Devonport - turnout 30 per cent
Candidates  Party  Votes  Elected
Syd Brooks  UK Independence Party  403   
Mark Antony Coker  The Labour Party  1,519  Yes
Betty Gray  The Conservative Party  830   
Andrew Robert Pratt  The Green Party  162   

Drake - turnout 33.8 per cent
Candidates  Party  Votes  Elected
Andy Fox  The Conservative Party  506   
Wendy Margaret Miller  The Green Party  116   
Chris Palmer  UK Independence Party  99   
David Santillo  Independent  97   
Chaz Singh  The Labour Party  589  Yes
Rebecca Jane Trimnell  The Liberal Democrats  178   

Efford and Lipson - turnout 36 per cent
Candidates  Party  Votes  Elected
Roger Michael Creagh-Osborne  The Green Party  161   
Ramon Philip Fereday  UK Independence Party  362   
Nick Kelly  The Conservative Party  832   
Pauline Murphy  The Labour and Co-operative Party  1,785  Yes
Duncan Telford Beasley  The Liberal Democrats  189   

Honicknowle - turnout 32 per cent
Candidates  Party  Votes  Elected
Mark John Lowry  The Labour Party  1,790  Yes
Ron Northcott  UK Independence Party  675   
Paul Rielly  The Conservative Party  671   
David Wildman  The Green Party  181
  
St Peter and The Waterfront - turnout 34.8 per cent
andidates  Party  Votes  Elected
Hugh Janes  The Liberal Democrats  415   
Roy Alfred Kettle  UK Independence Party  400   
Tam Macpherson  The Conservative Party  1,204   
Chris Penberthy  The Labour Party  1,607  Yes
Matt Ray  The Green Party  396   
Chris Robinson  The Conservative Party  1,165   
Ian Glenn Tuffin  The Labour Party  1,383  Yes

Sutton and Mount Gould - turnout 34.7 per cent
Candidates  Party  Votes  Elected
Katy Hitchman  The Conservative Party  822   
Tean Jane Mitchell  The Green Party  226   
Jean Florence Nelder  The Labour Party  1,625  Yes
Louise Anne Parker  Trade Unionists and Socialists against cuts  75   
Jonquil Patricia Webber  UK Independence Party  288   
Peter York  The Liberal Democrats  327   

Sunday, 17 April 2011

Plymouth Green Party 2011 Election Launch

(Press Release: 16.04.11)


Plymouth Green Party has launched the local election campaign for 2011. They are standing to promote a greener future for Plymouth, as well as for a ‘Yes’ vote in the referendum on the Alternative Vote.

Last year the party fielded parliamentary candidates in Plymouth; the first time voters in Plymouth had the chance to vote Green in a general election in eighteen years. They have been fielding local election candidates in numbers during the past decade.

There are familiar names to Green voters of the city, including Tean Mitchell in Sutton & Mount Gould and Andy Pratt in Devonport. Furthermore, the list comprises two of last year’s parliamentary candidates: Roger Creagh-Osborne – who stood in South East Cornwall in 2010 – in Efford & Lipson; as well as Wendy Miller in Drake, stood for the Plymouth Moor View constituency in 2010.

Wendy said:

“Most Green Party policies are taken up eventually by other parties. Why wait for them to catch up? By voting for real change now, we can pioneer paths to fairer and happier lives for people in Plymouth.”

She continued:

“Our party is consistently ahead of the times, on renewable energy, on the dangers of nuclear energy and weapons, on reducing waste, on creating jobs and on fairer distribution of wealth. While those who benefit from the status quo say there are no choices to how things are, people in the Plymouth Green Party say, Yes, actually there are many alternatives!”

While for two members, it is the very first time standing for Plymouth City Council: Matt Ray in St Peter & the Waterfront, and David Wildman in Honicknowle.

David said:

“I’m proud to stand as a candidate, for both Plymouth City Council and even more so as a Green representative. There are so many massive issues in this city that need addressing, from the cutting up of nuclear submarines to the building of incinerators. The council needs a true green voice to speak up on the foolishness of such initiatives.”

Plymouth Green Party aim to call out to voters who feel disenfranchised by the actions of other parties: the cuts of the Conservatives, the lies and deceit of the Liberal Democrats, and the hypocrisy of Labour.


Green Party candidates:

Roger Creagh-Osborne – Efford & Lipson
Wendy Miller – Drake
Tean Mitchell – Sutton & Mount Gould
Andy Pratt - Devonport
Matt Ray – St Peter & the Waterfront
Colin Trier - Compton
David Wildman - Honicknowle